SABR-Dual: a phase II/III trial of two-fraction versus five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy for localized low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen. METHODS: 502 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, radiopaque hydrogel spacer insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on either a standard CT-guided linear accelerator or MR-LINAC. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints. DISCUSSION: This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not obligate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06027892.

Survival analysis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC), but which patients benefit from stereotactic radiotherapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for early mortality. METHODS: From August 2010 to 2022, 617 patients with medically inoperable, peripheral or central ES-NSCLC were treated with SABR at our institution. We retrospectively evaluated the data from 172 consecutive patients treated from 2018 to 2020 to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). The biological effective dose was > 100 Gy10 in all patients, and 60 Gy was applied in 3-5 fractions for a gross tumor volume (GTV) + 3 mm margin when the tumor diameter was < 1 cm; 30-33 Gy was delivered in one fraction. Real-time tumor tracking or an internal target volume approach was applied in 96% and 4% of cases, respectively. In uni- and multivariate analysis, a Cox model was used for the following variables: ventilation parameter FEV1, histology, age, T stage, central vs. peripheral site, gender, pretreatment PET, biologically effective dose (BED), and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI). RESULTS: The median OS was 35.3 months. In univariate analysis, no correlation was found between OS and ventilation parameters, histology, PET, or centrality. Tumor diameter, biological effective dose, gender, and AACCI met the criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. The multivariate model showed that males (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; p = 0.05) and AACCI > 5 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.31; p = 0.026) were significant negative prognostic factors of OS. However, the analysis of OS showed that the significant effect of AACCI > 5 was achieved only after 3 years (3-year OS 37% vs. 56%, p = 0.021), whereas the OS in one year was similar (1-year OS 83% vs. 86%, p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: SABR of ES-NSCLC with precise image guidance is feasible for all medically inoperable patients with reasonable performance status. Early deaths were rare in our real-life cohort, and OS is clearly higher than would have been expected after best supportive care.

Short-term predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for untreated single non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a restrospective cohort study.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for brain metastases (BM) not eligible for surgical resection, however, predictors of SRS outcomes are poorly known. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of SRS outcome in patients with BM secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective is to analyze the value of volumetric criteria in identifying BM progression. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years of age with a single untreated BM secondary to NSCLC. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were assessed. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a BM volumetric increase 12 months after SRS. The unidimensional measurement of the BM at follow-up was also assessed. One hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a median BM volume at baseline of 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.4-2.3). Fifty-two (38.5%) patients had SRS failure at follow-up. Only right BM laterality was associated with SRS failure (p=0.039). Using the volumetric definition of SRS failure, the unidimensional criteria demonstrated a sensibility of 60.78% (46.11%-74.16%), specificity of 89.02% (80.18%-94.86%), positive LR of 5.54 (2.88-10.66) and negative LR of 0.44 (0.31-0.63). SRS demonstrated a 61.5% local control rate 12 months after treatment. Among the potential predictors of treatment outcome analyzed, only the right BM laterality had a significant association with SRS failure. The volumetric criteria were able to identify more subtle signs of BM increase than the unidimensional criteria, which may allow earlier diagnosis of disease progression and use of appropriate therapies.

Surgical management of large lower cranial nerves schwannomas: long term results of a less aggressive resection strategy.

In an effort to reduce the high morbidity and life-threatening complications after radical resection in large schwannoma surgery, alternative strategies of nontotal resections have emerged. To evaluate the long term clinical and oncological outcome after lower cranial nerves (LCN) schwannoma surgery operated on with a cranial nerve-sparing technique. Single center retrospective cohort study of 8 consecutive patients harboring LCN schwannomas operated on between March 2005 and October 2021. The mean LCN schwannoma diameter was 33 mm (range 26-51). Seven patients (87,5%) underwent a modified retrosigmoid approach. Three patients underwent gross total resection (37,5%), 3 had received neartotal resection (mean tumor residue 0,25 cc) and subtotal resection in 2 patients who presented with an extracranial extension of the tumor (mean tumor residue 2,44 cc). Both patients had received upfront additional GKRS. The three patients who presented with preoperative CN IX & X injuries recovered within 6 months after surgery. All of the five patients freed from any preoperative CNs IX & X symptoms experienced transient (80%) or definitive (one patient) disturbances after surgery. They all improved within 6 months but one who required long term gastrostomy feeding tube. This patient harbored a schwannoma originating from the glossopharyngeal nerve, which could not be anatomically preserved during surgery. Tumor control was achieved in 100% of cases with a mean follow-up of 91 months. LCN schwannomas could be surgically removed through a less aggressive non-radical resection strategy with acceptable functional results and excellent tumor control.

Identification of CT radiomic features robust to acquisition and segmentation variations for improved prediction of radiotherapy-treated lung cancer patient recurrence.

The primary objective of the present study was to identify a subset of radiomic features extracted from primary tumor imaged by computed tomography of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients, which remain unaffected by variations in segmentation quality and in computed tomography image acquisition protocol. The robustness of these features to segmentation variations was assessed by analyzing the correlation of feature values extracted from lesion volumes delineated by two annotators. The robustness to variations in acquisition protocol was evaluated by examining the correlation of features extracted from high-dose and low-dose computed tomography scans, both of which were acquired for each patient as part of the stereotactic body radiotherapy planning process. Among 106 radiomic features considered, 21 were identified as robust. An analysis including univariate and multivariate assessments was subsequently conducted to estimate the predictive performance of these robust features on the outcome of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. The univariate predictive analysis revealed that robust features demonstrated superior predictive potential compared to non-robust features. The multivariate analysis indicated that linear regression models built with robust features displayed greater generalization capabilities by outperforming other models in predicting the outcomes of an external validation dataset.

Reconciling the discrepancies in randomized data of combining immunotherapy and radiation therapy: Not all radiotherapy is created equal.

It remains highly unclear and debatable whether combining radiotherapy (RT) and immune checkpoint blocker (ICB) therapy yields improved outcomes compared to either modality alone. Whereas some randomized data have shown improved outcomes, others have not. As a result of these conflicting data, it is essential to reconcile differences in the data and postulate reasons thereof. This work seeks to address these discrepancies, and uses the lessons learned from both positive and negative trials, including the most cutting-edge data available, in order to guide future clinical trial design and clarify the ideal/expected role of combinatorial therapy going forward. Because RT offers two distinct contributions (cytoreductive (local) effects & immune-stimulating (systemic) effects), RT should complement immunotherapy by addressing immunotherapy-resistant clones, and immunotherapy should complement RT by addressing RT-resistant or out-of-field clones. RT is not merely a single "drug", but rather a constellation of diverse "drugs" that can be varied based on dose regimens, previous systemic therapy regimens, number of irradiated sites, treatment intent/location/timing, tumor biology, and individual patient immunological circumstances. These factors are discussed as an important explanation for the discrepancies in results of various randomized trials in heterogeneous populations and clinical settings, and these discrepancies may continue until trials of more uniform circumstances are designed to use particular RT paradigms that meaningfully add value to systemic therapy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for distant metastases to the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic disease to the head and neck (HN) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT to HN sites from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Treatment indications included the following: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and control a dominant area of progression (DAP). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control (LC), regional control (RC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed. Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were reported by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (58 lesions) were analysed with a median follow-up of 16 months. Primary sites included lung (25.0%), kidney (19.6%), breast (19.6%) and other (35.8%). SBRT indications were as follows: oligometastases (42.9%), oligoprogression (19.6%) and local control of a dominant area of progression (37.5%). Most patients received SBRT to a single neck node (n = 47, 81.0%). Median SBRT dose was 40 Gy (range 25-50 Gy) in five fractions, with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 Gy (range 37.5-100 Gy). One- and 2-year LC and RC rates were 97.6% and 72.7% as well as 100% and 86.7%, respectively. Median OS was 19.2 months (95% [CI] 14.8-69.4), and median PFS was 7.4 months (95% [CI] 5.2-11.9). The 1-year OS and PFS rates for oligometastases, oligoprogression and DAP were 95.8%, 63.6% and 38.1% (p = 0.0039) as well as 56.5%, 27.3% and 19.1% (p = 0.0004), respectively. On MVA, treatment indication and histology were predictive for OS, while indication and prior systemic therapy were predictive for PFS. Cumulative late grade 3 + toxicity rate was 11.3%, without grade 5 events. CONCLUSION: The use of SBRT for metastatic disease to the HN provided excellent LC rates with low rates of regional failure and an acceptable toxicity profile, highlighting its utility in these patients. Patients with oligometastatic disease had better OS and PFS than others.

Pre-operative vs. post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery for operative metastatic brain tumors: study protocol for a phase III clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Almost one third of cancer patients in the United States will develop brain metastases on an annual basis. Surgical resection is indicated in the setting of brain metastases for reasons, such as maximizing local control in select patients, decompression of mass effect, and/or tissue diagnosis. The current standard of care following resection of a brain metastasis has shifted from whole brain radiation therapy to post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, there is a significant rate of local recurrence within one year of postoperative SRS. Emerging retrospective and prospective data suggest pre-operative SRS is a safe and potentially effective treatment paradigm for surgical brain metastases. This trial intends to determine, for patients with an indication for resection of a brain metastasis, whether there is an increase in the time to a composite endpoint of adverse outcomes; including the first occurrence of either: local recurrence, leptomeningeal disease, or symptomatic radiation brain necrosis - in patients who receive pre-operative SRS as compared to patients who receive post-operative SRS. METHODS: This randomized phase III clinical trial compares pre-operative with post-operative SRS for brain metastases. A dynamic random allocation procedure will allocate an equal number of patients to each arm: pre-operative SRS followed by surgery or surgery followed by post-operative SRS. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: If pre-operative SRS improves outcomes relative to post-operative SRS, this will establish pre-operative SRS as superior. If post-operative SRS proves superior to pre-operative SRS, it will remain a standard of care and halt the increasing utilization of pre-operative SRS. If there is no difference in pre- versus post-operative SRS, then pre-operative SRS may still be preferred, given patient convenience and the potential for a condensed timeline. DISCUSSION: Emerging retrospective and prospective data have demonstrated some benefits of pre-op SRS vs. post-op SRS. This study will show whether there is an increase in the time to the composite endpoint. Additionally, the study will compare overall survival; patient-reported outcomes; morbidity; completion of planned therapies; time to systemic therapy; time to regional progression; time to CNS progression; time to subsequent treatment; rate of radiation necrosis; rate of local recurrence; and rate of leptomeningeal disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03750227 (Registration date: 21/11/2018).

Coordinated Same- or Next-Day Radiosurgery and Cochlear Implantation for Vestibular Schwannoma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience and results from coordinated and closely scheduled radiosurgery and cochlear implantation (CI) in a vestibular schwannoma (VS) cohort. PATIENTS: Patients with VS who underwent radiosurgery followed by CI on the same or next day. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included sequential radiosurgery and CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor control defined by tumor growth on posttreatment surveillance and audiometric outcomes including consonant-nucleus-consonant words and AzBio sentences in quiet. RESULTS: In total, six patients were identified that met the inclusion criteria, with an age range of 38 to 69 years and tumor sizes ranging from 2.0 to 16.3 mm. All patients successfully underwent radiosurgery and CI on the same or immediately successive day. Postoperatively, all patients obtained open-set speech recognition. Consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores ranged from 40 to 88% correct, and AzBio scores ranged from 44 to 94% correct. During posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging surveillance, which ranged from 12 to 68 months, all tumors were noted to be adequately visualized, and no tumor progression was noted. CONCLUSION: Coordinated radiosurgery and CI can be safely performed in patients with VS on the same or next day, serving to decrease burden on patients and increase access to this vital rehabilitative strategy.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung cancer: a contemporary review.

The treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has improved enormously in the last two decades. Although surgery is not the only choice, lobectomy is still the gold standard treatment type for operable patients. For inoperable patients stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be offered, reaching very high local control and overall survival rates. With SBRT we can precisely irradiate small, well-defined lesions with high doses. To select the appropriate fractionation schedule it is important to determine the size, localization and extent of the lung tumor. The introduction of novel and further developed planning (contouring guidelines, diagnostic image application, planning systems) and delivery techniques (motion management, image guided radiotherapy) led to lower rates of side effects and more conformal target volume coverage. The purpose of this study is to summarize the current developments, randomised studies, guidelines about lung SBRT, with emphasis on the possibility of increasing local control and overall rates in "fit," operable patients as well, so SBRT would be eligible in place of surgery.

Everything old is new again. revisiting hypophysectomy for the treatment of refractory cancer-related pain: a systematic review.

Cancer-related pain is a common and debilitating condition that can significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Opioids, NSAIDs, and antidepressants are among the first-line therapies, but their efficacy is limited or their use can be restricted due to serious side effects. Neuromodulation and lesioning techniques have also proven to be a valuable instrument for managing refractory pain. For patients who have exhausted all standard treatment options, hypophysectomy may be an effective alternative treatment. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the available literature on PubMed and Scielo databases on using hypophysectomy to treat refractory cancer-related pain. Data extraction from included studies included study design, treatment model, number of treated patients, sex, age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, primary cancer site, lead time from diagnosis to treatment, alcohol injection volume, treatment data, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis was reported using counts (N, %) and means (range). The study included data from 735 patients from 24 papers treated with hypophysectomy for refractory cancer-related pain. 329 cancer-related pain patients were treated with NALP, 216 with TSS, 66 with RF, 55 with Y90 brachytherapy, 51 with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GK), and 18 with cryoablation. The median age was 58.5 years. The average follow-up time was 8.97 months. Good pain relief was observed in 557 out of 735 patients, with complete pain relief in 108 out of 268 patients. Pain improvement onset was observed 24 h after TSS, a few days after NALP or cryoablation, and a few days to 4 weeks after GK. Complications varied among treatment modalities, with diabetes insipidus (DI) being the most common complication. Although mostly forgotten in modern neurosurgical practice, hypophysectomy is an attractive option for treating refractory cancer-related pain after failure of traditional therapies. Radiosurgery is a promising treatment modality due to its high success rate and reduced risk of complications.

Impact of biologically effective dose on tremor decrease after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy for essential tremor: a retrospective longitudinal analysis.

This letter to the editor critiques a recent study evaluating the role of biologically effective dose (BED) in stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy for essential tremor (ET). The study, conducted retrospectively on 78 ET patients, demonstrates a significant correlation between BED and tremor improvement post-SRS. Moreover, the study suggests adjusting the prescribed dose rather than changing cobalt-60 sources to maintain treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity. This suggestion aligns with previous research indicating an annual decrease in BED due to cobalt-60 decay. The letter emphasizes the importance of considering BED and cobalt-60 decay in optimizing treatment outcomes for ET patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery. Further research is recommended to explore innovative techniques for dose modulation in response to cobalt-60 decay and validate findings in larger cohorts.

Upfront stereotactic radiosurgery versus adjuvant radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Parafalcine and parasagittal (PFPS) are common locations for meningiomas. Surgical resection for these tumors, the first-line treatment, poses challenges due to their proximity to critical structures. This systematic review investigates the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a treatment for PFPS meningiomas, aiming to elucidate its safety and efficacy. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria involved studies on SRS for PFPS meningiomas, reporting procedure outcomes and complications. Tumors were presumed or confirmed to be WHO grade 1. Data was systematically extracted. Meta-analysis was performed where applicable. The review included data from eight studies, 821 patients with 878 lesions. Tumor control was achieved in greater than 80% of cases. Adverse radiation effects were reported in 7.3% of them. Recurrence and further surgical approach were observed in 17.1% and 9.2% of cases, respectively. Symptom improvement was noted in 33.2% of patients. Edema occurred in approximately 25.1% of patients. A subgroup of 283 patients had upfront SRS, achieving tumor control in approximately 97% of such cases. SRS is a safe and effective treatment for PFPS meningiomas, both as an adjuvant therapy and as an upfront treatment for often smaller tumors. Post-SRS edema can typically be managed medically and usually does not require further surgical intervention. Further studies should provide more specific data on PFPS meningiomas. The use of single and hypofractionated SRS for larger volume PFPS meningiomas should be more explored to better define the risks and benefits.

Wedge Resection versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors ≤8 mm.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall survival of patients with ≤8 mm non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo wedge resection versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to evaluate the overall survival of patients with ≤8 mm NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017 who underwent wedge resection versus patients who underwent SBRT. The above-mentioned matched analyses were repeated for patients with no comorbidities. Patients who were coded in the NCDB as having undergone radiation because surgery was contraindicated due to patient risk factors (e.g., comorbid conditions, advance age, etc.) and those with a history of prior malignancy were excluded from analysis. Of the 1505 patients who had NSCLC ≤8 mm during the study period, 1339 (89%) patients underwent wedge resection, and 166 (11%) patients underwent SBRT. In the unadjusted analysis, multivariable Cox modeling and propensity score-matched analysis, wedge resection was associated with improved survival when compared to SBRT. These results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to patients with no comorbidities.

[Stereotactic radiosurgery of brain tumors]. / Agyi daganatos elváltozások sztereotaxiás besugárzása.

Stereotactic radiosurgery is today a well-established treatment modality for various intracranial pathologies. The principle of high dose focused intracranial radiation guided by stereotactic technique ("Gamma Knife") was introduced by the Swedish neurosurgeon Prof. Lars Leksell in 1968. After the advent of CT and later MR imaging, stereotactic radiosurgery evolved rapidly regarding indications, and new technical solutions made it possible for linear accelerator systems to perform radiosurgery. A huge number of patients are treated yearly worldwide with this technology. In this article we overview the major indications, advantages and possible complications of stereotactic radiosurgery.

Stereotactic radiosurgery with versus without embolization for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been established as a safe and alternative treatment for dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). While embolization alone is the most commonly used modality for the treatment of dAVFs, the adjunctive use of embolization with SRS, with the growing use of SRS, has gained increasing interest in the past few years. However, the relative efficacy and safety of SRS combined with embolization versus SRS alone for dAVFs remains uncertain. Hence, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SRS with adjunctive embolization for intracranial dAVFs. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to August 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of adjunctive embolization and SRS for dAVFs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was conducted on the suitable outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 715 patients were included. The mean age of the participants in the study was 64.30 years in the adjunctive embolization group and 60.51 years in the SRS-alone group. In the adjunctive embolization group 41.3% of patients were female, compared with 47.1% in the SRS-only group. The dAVF obliteration rates were 64.7% and 65.7% in the adjunctive embolization and SRS-alone groups, respectively. These obliteration rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.96), as were the symptom improvement rates (p = 0.35). Adverse events were rare, and were more commonly associated with the adjunctive embolization procedure, although further causal analysis was not possible. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that adjunctive embolization plus SRS provides similar obliteration and symptom improvement rates compared with SRS alone, with both having very limited SRS-related adverse events. Considering the added burden and adverse events of additional endovascular treatment, the authors recommend embolization be reserved for more complex dAVFs or when embolization can potentially be curative alone or provide more rapid symptomatic relief or protection during the radiosurgical latency period.

Patient Cranial Angle and Intrafractional Stability in CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether variations in cranial angles and treatment accuracy during CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery necessitate adjustment of the margins of the planning target volume. Patients and Methods: Data from 66 patients receiving CyberKnife treatment for brain tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were immobilized using a thermoplastic mask and headrest. The cranial angle was measured on planning CT and patients were divided into 2 groups: ≤10° (Group A) and >10° (Group B). Intrafractional motion was recorded using the CyberKnife tracking system over 50 min. Translational and rotational errors were compared between groups, and planning target volume margins were calculated. Results: In Group A, significant translational error differences were found along with the X-axis over time (P < .02). In Group B, significant differences occurred along with the Z-axis (P < .03). No significant rotational or 3-dimensional vector differences were found in either group. Group A had significantly lower Y-axis (P < .045) and roll axis (P < .005) errors compared to Group B. Estimated planning target volume margins in Group A were 0.56 mm (X), 0.46 mm (Y), and 0.47 mm (Z). In Group B, margins were 0.62 mm (X), 0.48 mm (Y), and 0.46 mm (Z). Margins covering 95% of intrafraction motion were 0.49 to 0.50 mm (X, Y, Z) and 0.69 mm (3-dimensional vector) for Group A, and 0.48 to 0.60 mm and 0.79 mm for Group B. With a 1-mm margin, complete coverage was achieved in Group A while 2.1% of vectors in Group B exceeded 1 mm. Conclusion: Adjusting cranial angle to ≤10° during thermoplastic mask molding provided better or similar intrafractional stability compared to >10°.

[Expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of brain arteriovenous malformation].

Brain arteriovenous malformation (BAVM) is a cerebral vasculature disorder caused by gene mutation. Current available treatment measures include surgical resection, interventional embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery. The three therapeutic methods have their own advantages for different vascular structures.However, due to the complex vascular architecture of the lesion and its close anatomical relationship with brain tissue, any single treatment can not safely and effectively treat all BAVM cases. Therefore, in order to better regulate and guide the clinical diagnosis and treatment of BAVM patients in China, the National Medical School for Neurological Diseases, the Professional Committee of Neurointervention of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the radio-neurosurgery Expert Committee of the World Chinese Neurosurgeons Association jointly discussed and formulated this expert consensus. After in-depth analysis of the evidence of evidence-based medicine at home and abroad, the expert group combined with the specific situation of China, and gave 33 recommendations on specific clinical diagnosis and treatment issues such as predictive factors of cerebral arteriovenous malformation hemorrhage, clinical risks during pregnancy, imaging diagnosis measures, and clinical treatment strategies, in order to provide guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of BAVM nationwide.

[Frameless trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery with a dedicated linear accelerator: From equipment commissioning to initial clinical results]. / Radiochirurgie des névralgies trigéminales avec accélérateur linéaire dédié sans cadre invasif : de la mise en service de l'appareil aux premiers résultats cliniques.

PURPOSE: Radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia delivers a very high dose in a single fraction, over a few millimeters, at a single isocenter placed along the nerve. We present here the different steps that have been performed to validate small beams by conical collimators, and report the clinical results of the first patients treated on Novalis Tx®, frameless. MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, the geometric accuracy of 4 and 6mm conical collimators was evaluated using Winston-Lutz tests; then dosimetric data acquisition was performed using high spatial resolution detectors (PTW 60019 microdiamond and a PTW 60017 E-diode). The corrective factors of the TRS 483 report were applied to calculate the collimator aperture factors. These dosimetric data were then compared with the data implemented in the iPlan® treatment planning system. Then end-to-end tests were performed to control the entire treatment process using an anthropomorphic phantom "STEEV". Between 2020 and 2022, 18 patients were treated for refractory trigeminal neuralgia on Novalis Tx®, frameless, with Exactrac® repositioning. A total of 17 patients were evaluated (one was lost to follow-up) using the BNI score for pain assessment and MRI with a median follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: The quality criteria of geometric and dosimetric accuracy were met for the 6-mm cone but not for the 4-mm cone. All patients were treated with a 6-mm cone with a dose of 90Gy prescribed at the isocenter at the root entry zone. Initial pain control was obtained in 70.5% of our patients, and 53% maintained pain control with a median follow-up of 12 months. All recurrences occurred within 3 to 6 months after radiosurgery. No brainstem toxicity was observed. Six patients had non-disabling facial hypoesthesia, half of whom already had pretreatment hypoesthesia. CONCLUSION: The treatment of trigeminal neuralgia on a dedicated linear accelerator is a highly technical treatment whose accuracy and safety are paramount. The physical measurements allowed the commissioning of the technique with a 6mm cone. Our first clinical results are in accordance with the literature.

DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.